Thursday, March 25, 2010

Walking the tight rope

0
            The Bridge drawing is one of my all-time favorite assessments. It gives you an glimpse into a specific point in one’s life. If you’re like me, you are ever changing. I know that for me, I am not in the same place now as I was when I created the bridge drawing (for me, it was a tight rope drawing). I think I can probably do a bridge drawing just about every week and it would not be the same. It could be beneficial to administer this assessment at the beginning and end of treatment to note any change or progress experienced by the client.
            If I were assessing my artwork, I would want to focus on the fact that there are no supports for the bridge, there is a lack of scenery, nor is there an indication of where the person is going to or coming from. All of those seem to indicate a difficult transition and a lack of support- but I can neither confirm nor deny the validity of those assumptions.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Favorite Kind of Assessment

0
     This assessment is one of my personal favorites. I think it is beneficial when working with clients how are resistant to communicate their preferences. In doing this assessment myself, I found that it is very useful in allowing the client to share personal preferences. I had a client who had a difficult time expressing anything about his feeling or preferences, and I planned on using this assessment to help him discuss his preference. Unfortunately, he did not want to do art therapy any more, and I never got the chance (oh well, maybe next time!) I think another reason for its success is because it is simple to conduct and the supplies are not complicated. The only thing needed are crayons and a sheet of standard xerox paper. These are materials that almost anyone is comfortable with, which may reduce client anxiety.

Friday, March 19, 2010

(Not Your Typical) Bird Nest Drawing

0
            Interesting- Not your typical bird nest. This is a rendering ogf a client’s artwork. The client states that it was a humming bird’s nest.
            The bird nest drawing (BND) asks the client to draw a bird nest and to write a short story about it. The assessment measures attachment styles. The art work does not seem to suggest poor attachment; however, prior history suggests otherwise. I selected this assessment for this client because his charts indicate that there are strained family relationships. The client did not depict anything but the nest. It was a head-on view of the nest. It also was not a typical bird nest, it was a humming bird nest.
            The story describes how the nest was made and that the nest was “cozy.” Ut did not say anything about those who inhabit the nest. This would lead me to believe that the home may be comfortable but I also wonder why his charts indicate differently. During our next session, I will administer the KFD to examine family relationships and structure. I think that both of these assessments can work well together and lend support to each other when trying to understand family dynamics.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

UPAP

0
           Seriously!? This assessment did nothing for me but irritate me. Okay, maybe I’m over reacting, but not by much. Literally, I feel like I was working on this assessment forever! I just know that this series of four drawings made me frustrated. I felt like with each consecutive drawing, I was losing motivation. It could be because there were no time contraits placed on the drawings. Also, it could be because there is a lack of structure in this assessment. The assessment askes the participant to complete four drawings three of which are based on scribble drawings.
            The materials, similarly, frustrated me. I kept on tarring my newsprint and the pastels kept breaking. It would be better to do the art on stronger papers, as well as adding more structure by imposing a time limit. The time limit could help the participant focus more on the task instead of getting distracted . I could have had a bad experience with this directive because of my mood that day (I don’t recall). I would like to try it again under different circumstances. But I think my experience is an example of the delicacy of assessments. An assessment is only a snapshot of one point in time. It is impossible to control for every possible variable.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Who picks and apple from a tree... seriously?

0
     The person picking an apple from a tree assessment is used as a way of identifying patholigical tendencies. The formal elements of art therapy scale (FEATS) is used as a rating system for this assessment. It simply asks for the client to draw a person picking an apple from a tree, and the rest is fair game.
     One day I was drawing with a little girl and she asked me what she should draw. Of course, I told her to draw a person picking an apple from the tree (her parents were totally okay with it). 

This rendering shows that she had a clever way of getting the apple. It fell on her. There is an absence of a ground line; however, the page line could be considered the ground line. The girl was only 7, thus she is right on track as far as her artistic development. It could be inferred from her drawing that perhaps she does not have to work hard for what she is given, since the apple comes to her. Her parents and grandparents spoil her- she really doesn't have to work hard for what she is given (her parents totally agree!)

Saturday, February 20, 2010

One foot, Two FEATS

1

            So I am not going to life, I was a little disappointed with the FEATS. Maybe it is my fault for not being educated before the assessment, but since the rating scale for the DDS is the FEATS, I thought I would get a diagnosis. But since we do not diagnose, I thought at least I would get an idea of specific pathology, but no! It really only measures if the client is presenting pathological behavior or not. I guess that is all right, but I was expecting more. I think for my purposes, I would rather use an assessment that can indicate some specific pathology. Is it possible to assess the artwork for the DDS with Lowenfeld’s levels of graphic development? Maybe the PPAT would be beneficial, if it was looking at specific pathology.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Excuse me! Did you just Cathart?

1
            During an unexpected chain of events I accidently catharted in class. I blame it on the DDS! During this assessment in which I was instructed to draw three images, one of which was how I was feeling that day, I was able to release a lot of energy and turn sublimate into something acceptable- pretty cool, It was probably the first time in my life! Now it may have been because I has a bad day on the job, or maybe because it was getting late, but as I progressed through the individual stages of the assessment I found myself becoming increasingly frustrated. And then I let it rip! With one bold streak of a red pastel I was off. Releasing all sorts of energy, but the amazing thing was that I was able to bring it full circle, and I found myself at peace when I was done.
          
     I though I was crazy, but when I did the assessment on another person, I found that she had the same reaction. Especially going into the third drawing. She began the image quite frustrated and ended at peace (only after experiencing a healthy dose of catharsis). I had the same results with yet another person as well. This leads me to wonder if the DDS assessment had any intrinsic therapeutic value or if it was a random coincidence of what happens when you release energy on a bad day.